Analisis Akurasi Perhitungan Nilai Ejeksi Fraksi Cardiac Magnetic Resonance untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Layanan Kesehatan di Ruang Radiologi

Authors

  • Awan Pelawi Universitas Efarina
  • Veryyon Harahap Universitas Efarina
  • Yeni Trisna Purba Universitas Efarina
  • Nomelda Zalukhu Universitas Efarina
  • Auhon Berkat Sijabat Universitas Efarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36565/prosiding.v2i1.82

Keywords:

cardiac magnetic resonance, ejection fraction, long axis, short axis

Abstract

Ejection Fraction (EF) is a parameter for assessing the heart's ability to pump blood throughout the body. Currently, ultrasound is frequently used to detect EF values, but it has limitations such as poor acoustic window and operator dependency. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) examination has advantages in providing accurate EF values with two measurement methods: Short Axis and Long Axis view. This study aims to determine the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction values in CMR examination using short axis and long axis view methods compared to echocardiography. Method: descriptive quantitative research design on EF calculation conducted at radiology installation in Jakarta hospital from July-October 2022 with 33 patient samples. Data were obtained through observation and measurement using CVI 42 software on 1.5T GE Signa Voyager MRI device. Results: The average EF percentage on LVEF-EC measurement method was 41%, LVEF-SA 40%, and LVEF-LA 43%. The accuracy showed EC-SA average difference of 0.939 with 3% percentage and EC-LA average difference of 1.812 with 5% percentage. Conclusion: Short axis method is more accurate compared to long axis, thus can be used as standard procedure for CMR examination to provide quality diagnostic services.

References

Alfakih, K., Plein, S., Thiele, H., Jones, T., Ridgway, J. P., & Sivananthan, M. U. (2003). Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 17(3), 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10262

Childs, H., Ma, L., Ma, M., Clarke, J., Cocker, M., Green, J., Strohm, O., & Friedrich, M. G. (2011). Comparison of long and short axis quantification of left ventricular volume parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, with ex-vivo validation. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-40

Hsu, J. J., Ziaeian, B., & Fonarow, G. C. (2017). Heart failure with mid-range (borderline) ejection fraction: Clinical implications and future directions. JACC: Heart Failure, 5(11), 763-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2017.06.013

Huttin, O., Voilliot, D., Mandry, D., Sellal, J. M., Juillière, Y., & Selton-Suty, C. (2015). All you need is LAX: A simplified CMR protocol for LVEF and LV mass quantification. BMC Medical Imaging, 15(1), 1-8.

Lang, R. M., Badano, L. P., Victor, M. A., Afilalo, J., Armstrong, A., Ernande, L., Flachskampf, F. A., Foster, E., Goldstein, S. A., Kuznetsova, T., Lancellotti, P., Muraru, D., Picard, M. H., Retzschel, E. R., Rudski, L., Spencer, K. T., Tsang, W., & Voigt, J. U. (2015). Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 28(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003

Marwick, T. H. (2018). Ejection fraction pros and cons: JACC state-of-the-art review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(19), 2360-2379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2162

Suparyanto, & Rosad. (2015). Data Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia 2018. Suparyanto Dan Rosad, 5(3), 248-253.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-14

Issue

Section

Articles